You are currently browsing the American Clarity weblog archives for the day 11. September 2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | Oct » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
- cultural/racial (13)
- economy (9)
- philosophy (38)
- politics (44)
- Theology (25)
- Uncategorized (2)
- 29. July 2010: Citizens' rights vs global humanitarianism: rights, responsibility, and amnesty
- 25. July 2010: The giving nature of God: proof of His existence in Jesus Christ
- 24. July 2010: In defense of "extremism": why worldview matters
- 21. July 2010: Can conservatism ever really shake the accusation of racism?
- 18. July 2010: Social justice and corruption
- 10. July 2010: A time to mock: finding the right time for ridicule
- 15. June 2010: Mormon malls: rethinking philanthropy, tithing, and the separation of church and state
- 13. June 2010: Is drug abuse a medical problem?
- 11. June 2010: Celebrating the miracle of Israel
- 10. June 2010: Approaching death: regaining proper perspective
Archive for 11. September 2009
Hide the kids: Obama’s coming
11. September 2009 by admin.
Earlier this week, Obama addressed the nation’s children as they headed off to school. While many parents were happy to see the president personally address their children from the television, others refused to allow their children participate in school events where the president was to be broadcasted.
The latter group was portrayed as being insanely protective, almost terrified that “Barama” would get into their youths’ minds and turn them into Godless commies. But after analyzing Obama’s speech, what we find are not only a series of confusing contradictory statements, but also those supporting an incredibly liberal agenda. After reading the speech, it is my conclusion that any parent interested in raising their child properly would at least take the time to explain why Barack Obama was flat wrong on several issues.
But first, we must begin by saying that statements aren’t really islands to themselves. They almost always come in groups, with some statements being necessarily implied by other statements. If a persons says that someone is “good,” they are admitting to a moral standard in which both the speaker and the listener are assumed to believe. If you say that all men are created equal, you must necessarily be implying that evolution is not the process by which we arrived at our present state, since evolution demands that some portions of the population are always biologically superior and better adapted than the other populations, and that only this evolutionary process would separate us from the animals. In a logical world, this is the consistent way most statements work. Acknowledging the truth of a statement thus silently acknowledges other supporting statements as true.
So let us look at several statements made by our President in his speech. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in philosophy, politics | Print | No Comments »