You are currently browsing the American Clarity weblog archives for the day 2. April 2011.
- cultural/racial (32)
- economy (18)
- foreign policy (6)
- immigration (5)
- Islam (3)
- multiculturalism (14)
- natural law and rights (35)
- Personal (1)
- philosophy (85)
- politics (75)
- sex (4)
- Theology (44)
- Uncategorized (8)
- worldview (13)
- 26. April 2012: The evil of disorder
- 16. April 2012: Biblical justice for Trayvon and Zimmerman
- 13. April 2012: Lessons from Rome about liberal unity
- 10. April 2012: Reflections on Kony 2012: why liberal charities make me angry
- 10. April 2012: Race mobs, Trayvon, and my conversion to conservatism
- 25. March 2012: Sharing the burdens of others: sympathy and empathy
- 13. March 2012: The Biblical case against supporting Israel
- 29. February 2012: The honorable clerk
- 28. February 2012: Christian Sharia? Part 1: Biblical Law in Historical America
- 22. February 2012: Christian Sharia? Part 2: Applying Biblical Law to a Free Society
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
Archive for 2. April 2011
Objections to God’s law
2. April 2011 by admin.
Of the many controversial stances I have taken, few have resulted in more opposition than my declaration that God’s Law is eternally applicable to human society. As such, in the interest of sparing time, I’ve created this primer to explain the necessity of a Biblical foundation for law, and to address the most common objections against one.
Before addressing these objections, it must be known that the greatest reason for promoting Biblical principles within a Christian society is that God has established these principles in the creation of Israel. As such, it is reasonable to conclude that since He is God, He is righteous, and Israel is His, He would not have dispensed a poorly crafted or quasi-moral legal system. Rather, it is only sensible to accept that these are the highest legal and moral principles ever drafted, and that we can neither improve nor reject them if we are to live righteously and function optimally. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in natural law and rights, philosophy, Theology | Print | 3 Comments »