<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for American Clarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://americanclarity.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://americanclarity.com</link>
	<description>Essays political, philosophical, and theological from an American romantic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The irrational modern woman, sexual anarchy, and &#8220;rape culture&#8221; by asw12</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/05/19/the-irrational-modern-woman-sexual-anarchy-and-rape-culture/#comment-60772</link>
		<dc:creator>asw12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=585#comment-60772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let women stand together in unanimity, and testify that whatever man thinks of us, we will be ladies – and we expect men to be gentlemen!

Gilder&#039;s book, &quot;Men and Marriage&quot; (originally titled, &quot;Sexual Suicide&quot;), explains why only the formulation above will solve the cultural problem. The closing line of the article, while certainly an admirable sentiment, is not likely to contribute to establishing better cultural values.

The author&#039;s formulation presumes (hopes) that the male can influence the female to behave as a lady if the male behaves as a gentleman. Unfortunately, feminism is Envy driven. So long as that Envy is culturally condoned, better behavior by the male will only encourage worse behavior by the female.

The preponderance of the power to control the culture in a civil society will always reside with females. This is so because a male&#039;s sexual need is significantly stronger than the female&#039;s. Therefore, the male has to conform to the female&#039;s cultural demands to obtain satisfactory sexual access.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let women stand together in unanimity, and testify that whatever man thinks of us, we will be ladies – and we expect men to be gentlemen!</p>
<p>Gilder&#8217;s book, &#8220;Men and Marriage&#8221; (originally titled, &#8220;Sexual Suicide&#8221;), explains why only the formulation above will solve the cultural problem. The closing line of the article, while certainly an admirable sentiment, is not likely to contribute to establishing better cultural values.</p>
<p>The author&#8217;s formulation presumes (hopes) that the male can influence the female to behave as a lady if the male behaves as a gentleman. Unfortunately, feminism is Envy driven. So long as that Envy is culturally condoned, better behavior by the male will only encourage worse behavior by the female.</p>
<p>The preponderance of the power to control the culture in a civil society will always reside with females. This is so because a male&#8217;s sexual need is significantly stronger than the female&#8217;s. Therefore, the male has to conform to the female&#8217;s cultural demands to obtain satisfactory sexual access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concerning the protection of women (a note on the upcoming article) by Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/05/13/concerning-the-protection-of-women-a-note-on-the-upcoming-article/#comment-60768</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=490#comment-60768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God bless you, Sir! No woman, regardless what she says, wants a wimp!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God bless you, Sir! No woman, regardless what she says, wants a wimp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Against the Boston interfaith vigil by Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/04/30/against-the-boston-interfaith-vigil/#comment-60745</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=668#comment-60745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMEN BROTHER!!!

I get it that the unbelievers among us are going to behave like unbelievers, like the heathens they are. I get it that they have a world view totally different from mine. What I don&#039;t get is when (supposedly) Christian Churches adopt doctrines of demons which the Bible clearly condemns and then tell me I&#039;m the one who isn&#039;t acting like a Christian! I get it that there are differences in the form of worship, whether babies should be baptized, just how much of God is there in that communion wafer. What I don&#039;t get is the sanctioning of homosexuality and homosexual marriage and abortion, singing kumbayah with the Earth worshippers and Allah (who bears all the characteristics of Satan) worshippers. I am at the point where I often just stand there, mouth agape unable to say anything when I see the total absence of any logic or critical thinking. My country has become Bizarro Land! 

What keeps me sane is the assurance that Christ is my Savior and that He is in charge and will someday clean up this God forsaken mess! And that is truly what I think has happened; the United States has gone one step too far and God has stepped back and decided to let us experience fully what happens when we tell Him to step aside and let us self important nincompoops run the show ourselves. Oh, I hope and pray that it isn&#039;t so, but I fear that it is. In the mean time I have a number of friends and relatives and colleagues whom I very much love who are part of the crowd on the broad path to perdition and I have no idea what to do about it.

I love your blog and have been reading you for a little over a year. I like the new look in your format as it is easier on the eyes - AND now I can post comments. I had a great deal of trouble with the old comment process and I don&#039;t think I was ever able to get one through.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN BROTHER!!!</p>
<p>I get it that the unbelievers among us are going to behave like unbelievers, like the heathens they are. I get it that they have a world view totally different from mine. What I don&#8217;t get is when (supposedly) Christian Churches adopt doctrines of demons which the Bible clearly condemns and then tell me I&#8217;m the one who isn&#8217;t acting like a Christian! I get it that there are differences in the form of worship, whether babies should be baptized, just how much of God is there in that communion wafer. What I don&#8217;t get is the sanctioning of homosexuality and homosexual marriage and abortion, singing kumbayah with the Earth worshippers and Allah (who bears all the characteristics of Satan) worshippers. I am at the point where I often just stand there, mouth agape unable to say anything when I see the total absence of any logic or critical thinking. My country has become Bizarro Land! </p>
<p>What keeps me sane is the assurance that Christ is my Savior and that He is in charge and will someday clean up this God forsaken mess! And that is truly what I think has happened; the United States has gone one step too far and God has stepped back and decided to let us experience fully what happens when we tell Him to step aside and let us self important nincompoops run the show ourselves. Oh, I hope and pray that it isn&#8217;t so, but I fear that it is. In the mean time I have a number of friends and relatives and colleagues whom I very much love who are part of the crowd on the broad path to perdition and I have no idea what to do about it.</p>
<p>I love your blog and have been reading you for a little over a year. I like the new look in your format as it is easier on the eyes &#8211; AND now I can post comments. I had a great deal of trouble with the old comment process and I don&#8217;t think I was ever able to get one through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with niceness: bravery, stoicism, and the cancer patient by admin</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/04/21/the-trouble-with-niceness-bravery-stoicism-and-the-cancer-patient/#comment-60741</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 02:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=545#comment-60741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve never heard of Marcus Aurelius?  Seneca?  Stoicism may have originated in Greece, but I would say the Romans contributed quite a few of the greatest stoics.  You are correct, though, in that stoicism is &lt;em&gt;originally&lt;/em&gt; Greek.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve never heard of Marcus Aurelius?  Seneca?  Stoicism may have originated in Greece, but I would say the Romans contributed quite a few of the greatest stoics.  You are correct, though, in that stoicism is <em>originally</em> Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with niceness: bravery, stoicism, and the cancer patient by thecarolinacowboy</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/04/21/the-trouble-with-niceness-bravery-stoicism-and-the-cancer-patient/#comment-60740</link>
		<dc:creator>thecarolinacowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 02:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=545#comment-60740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2. Stoic A member of an originally Greek school of philosophy, founded by Zeno about 308 b.c., believing that God determined everything for the best and that virtue is sufficient for happiness. Its later Roman form advocated the calm acceptance of all occurrences as the unavoidable result of divine will or of the natural order.

Not Roman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2. Stoic A member of an originally Greek school of philosophy, founded by Zeno about 308 b.c., believing that God determined everything for the best and that virtue is sufficient for happiness. Its later Roman form advocated the calm acceptance of all occurrences as the unavoidable result of divine will or of the natural order.</p>
<p>Not Roman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with niceness: bravery, stoicism, and the cancer patient by admin</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/04/21/the-trouble-with-niceness-bravery-stoicism-and-the-cancer-patient/#comment-60739</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=545#comment-60739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, sir!

You may be interested in knowing that I myself have spent a good chunk of time pondering the heroism of the soldier, and I&#039;ve had a drafted article on the subject for quite some time now.  Haven&#039;t been able to finish it, but it&#039;s certainly thoughtful material.

-J]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, sir!</p>
<p>You may be interested in knowing that I myself have spent a good chunk of time pondering the heroism of the soldier, and I&#8217;ve had a drafted article on the subject for quite some time now.  Haven&#8217;t been able to finish it, but it&#8217;s certainly thoughtful material.</p>
<p>-J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with niceness: bravery, stoicism, and the cancer patient by DavidE</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/04/21/the-trouble-with-niceness-bravery-stoicism-and-the-cancer-patient/#comment-60738</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/?p=545#comment-60738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonderful writing, I&#039;m sorry to have just found your page.

I have often thought the same as you about Heroism as you have written here about Bravery. I believe that Hero, as of late, has been misused or improperly given to men who have done nothing to be called one. For example, merely wearing a uniform or have been given a badge and being in close proximity to a disaster or act of violence does not make one a hero, it does not preclude one from doing something heroic but in the same does not entitle one to be proclaimed &#039;hero&#039;. 

I am so happy to have stumbled upon your writings, very refreshing and enjoyable reading.

God bless,
Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful writing, I&#8217;m sorry to have just found your page.</p>
<p>I have often thought the same as you about Heroism as you have written here about Bravery. I believe that Hero, as of late, has been misused or improperly given to men who have done nothing to be called one. For example, merely wearing a uniform or have been given a badge and being in close proximity to a disaster or act of violence does not make one a hero, it does not preclude one from doing something heroic but in the same does not entitle one to be proclaimed &#8216;hero&#8217;. </p>
<p>I am so happy to have stumbled upon your writings, very refreshing and enjoyable reading.</p>
<p>God bless,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You will know them by their fruits by Caren MacMurchy</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/02/15/you-will-know-them-by-their-fruits/#comment-60522</link>
		<dc:creator>Caren MacMurchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/02/15/you-will-know-them-by-their-fruits/#comment-60522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Jeremy ~ Thank you for responding to the fluff of Christian magazines which is the tip of the proverbial iceberg.  The clear-eyed wisdom you offer is overdue and will hopefully swing the pendulum back toward North.  
You would enjoy reading and sitting at the feet of the wisest man I know, Dr. Dallas Willard.  Check him out.

God&#039;s speed, my good man ~ Caren MacMurchy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeremy ~ Thank you for responding to the fluff of Christian magazines which is the tip of the proverbial iceberg.  The clear-eyed wisdom you offer is overdue and will hopefully swing the pendulum back toward North.<br />
You would enjoy reading and sitting at the feet of the wisest man I know, Dr. Dallas Willard.  Check him out.</p>
<p>God&#8217;s speed, my good man ~ Caren MacMurchy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus is coming&#8230; for your guns! by Mark</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/24/jesus-is-coming-for-your-guns/#comment-60516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/24/jesus-is-coming-for-your-guns/#comment-60516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will not leave my brother without aid.

See:

http://www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/comninel/courses/3020pdf/vindiciae.pdf

What you choose to do with it, is of course another thing, yes it is safer to go back to sleep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will not leave my brother without aid.</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/comninel/courses/3020pdf/vindiciae.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/comninel/courses/3020pdf/vindiciae.pdf</a></p>
<p>What you choose to do with it, is of course another thing, yes it is safer to go back to sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus is coming&#8230; for your guns! by Mark</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/24/jesus-is-coming-for-your-guns/#comment-60515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/24/jesus-is-coming-for-your-guns/#comment-60515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christ would never condone Pauline (Paul the apostle) Christianity. For Christ said to his apostles;

&quot;But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
{Luke 22:36, NIV)

As for Christ being a quasi peacenik;

49 I am come to send fire on Earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled? 50 But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished! 51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Luke 12:49–53)

Hardly what is described in your article &quot;Jesus is coming - for your guns.&quot;

Now the grand finale, the true mission of Christ upon the earth;

“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.&quot; (Matthew 10:34 KJV)

These verses are irreconcilable with the position taken in your article non-seqtior, as its author stated a religious objection to the teachings of Christ throughout the entire article, saying that Pauline Christianity is a voluntary non-coercive Christianity in its wrap-up, what could be further from the truth? 

What the author of this article is actually stating in this Benzine article is that it is better for Christians the more innocent Christians to throw themselves to the lions, while serving their masters, for if one is serving their masters, how is it they will ever challenge the authority or dictates of the master thus serving God and Jesus? 

It is as Christ said &quot;No man can serve two master.&quot; 

Paul the Apostle was a religious anti-Christ degenerate, whose teachings have mislead millions if not billions of people, leading people away from the authentic Christ, towards the false Christ/image created by Paul. Do as Christ commanded &quot;Come out of her, and ye shall be saved.

Well written article, but there are many beguiling, false teaching here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ would never condone Pauline (Paul the apostle) Christianity. For Christ said to his apostles;</p>
<p>&#8220;But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”<br />
{Luke 22:36, NIV)</p>
<p>As for Christ being a quasi peacenik;</p>
<p>49 I am come to send fire on Earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled? 50 But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished! 51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Luke 12:49–53)</p>
<p>Hardly what is described in your article &#8220;Jesus is coming &#8211; for your guns.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now the grand finale, the true mission of Christ upon the earth;</p>
<p>“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.&#8221; (Matthew 10:34 KJV)</p>
<p>These verses are irreconcilable with the position taken in your article non-seqtior, as its author stated a religious objection to the teachings of Christ throughout the entire article, saying that Pauline Christianity is a voluntary non-coercive Christianity in its wrap-up, what could be further from the truth? </p>
<p>What the author of this article is actually stating in this Benzine article is that it is better for Christians the more innocent Christians to throw themselves to the lions, while serving their masters, for if one is serving their masters, how is it they will ever challenge the authority or dictates of the master thus serving God and Jesus? </p>
<p>It is as Christ said &#8220;No man can serve two master.&#8221; </p>
<p>Paul the Apostle was a religious anti-Christ degenerate, whose teachings have mislead millions if not billions of people, leading people away from the authentic Christ, towards the false Christ/image created by Paul. Do as Christ commanded &#8220;Come out of her, and ye shall be saved.</p>
<p>Well written article, but there are many beguiling, false teaching here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The psychological advantages of leftism by Clay Marley</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/02/14/the-psychological-advantages-of-leftism/#comment-60180</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Marley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/02/14/the-psychological-advantages-of-leftism/#comment-60180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post. I particularly like the list of reading material at the end. 

You just touched on the core belief that I think drives most leftist thinking. The idea that Men are born good. This leads to the idea that when people do bad things it is because of external influences. If we can just get rid of these influences in society, everyone will be happy and we can rid ourselves of crime. 

Guns cause violence for example. Or remove competition, which can hurt the self-esteem of the losers; dumb down education so everyone is a winner; redistribute wealth and give people stuff; create hate speech and hate crime laws; ban salt and sodas and even Styrofoam cups. We can regulate ourselves to utopia!

Islam has the same worldview. Hide a woman’s figure to eliminate the sins of lust and adultery. It’s no wonder the Left and Islam get along so well. The only difference is in what’s the right set of laws. Both lead down the same dark alley of oppression and tyranny.

I watched a video where a pop-scientist, Michio Kaku, talked about a future having Star Trek like nano- replicators that could bring on utopia by giving people instantly anything they wanted. I guess he never saw or understood “Forbidden Planet”.

I started to believe Satan was more than just a personification of evil after I realized that when people reject the Bible, no matter who they are, where they are, or their cultural background, their fundamental belief system develops into something that is always opposite the Bible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I particularly like the list of reading material at the end. </p>
<p>You just touched on the core belief that I think drives most leftist thinking. The idea that Men are born good. This leads to the idea that when people do bad things it is because of external influences. If we can just get rid of these influences in society, everyone will be happy and we can rid ourselves of crime. </p>
<p>Guns cause violence for example. Or remove competition, which can hurt the self-esteem of the losers; dumb down education so everyone is a winner; redistribute wealth and give people stuff; create hate speech and hate crime laws; ban salt and sodas and even Styrofoam cups. We can regulate ourselves to utopia!</p>
<p>Islam has the same worldview. Hide a woman’s figure to eliminate the sins of lust and adultery. It’s no wonder the Left and Islam get along so well. The only difference is in what’s the right set of laws. Both lead down the same dark alley of oppression and tyranny.</p>
<p>I watched a video where a pop-scientist, Michio Kaku, talked about a future having Star Trek like nano- replicators that could bring on utopia by giving people instantly anything they wanted. I guess he never saw or understood “Forbidden Planet”.</p>
<p>I started to believe Satan was more than just a personification of evil after I realized that when people reject the Bible, no matter who they are, where they are, or their cultural background, their fundamental belief system develops into something that is always opposite the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sin reemergent by admin</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/29/sin-reemergent/#comment-58815</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/29/sin-reemergent/#comment-58815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for your words and encouragement and your prayers -- God will deliver me; if not today, then tomorrow!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your words and encouragement and your prayers &#8212; God will deliver me; if not today, then tomorrow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sin reemergent by Jeff Paulus</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/29/sin-reemergent/#comment-58796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Paulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2013/01/29/sin-reemergent/#comment-58796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hang in there, my prayers are with you. I am from the opposite side of the state from you as I live in Spokane. I came across your blog for the 1st time on the American Thinker website and I enjoy what you have to say. I have been a Christian for over 40 yrs. I was saved while I was in the Navy in Sept. 1972. All I know is that God is faithful, no matter what we go through because God&#039;s grace and mercy are irrevocable. God is not an Indian giver, once we accept his salvation and as hard as it can be at times HE is always with us and will be faithful and come through for us in a way usually we don&#039;t understand or in another way that declares his glory. I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re going through but God will provide a way for you to survive and avoid temptation. From my own experiences and everything I&#039;ve gone through in 40+ yrs. as a Christian I know that God is faithful, no matter what. In fact the past 5 yrs. of my life have the been the most blessed and grace filled  times of my life in the midst of adversity that I have faced since my marriage of 30 yrs. broke up in 2007. God is faithful. I am a walking testament of God&#039;s grace and mercy and wouldn&#039;t trade it to have things the way they were. It&#039;s hard, at times it stinks but I know that God will provide all that I need, guaranteed and I can have peace about it. May God bless you in your journey and know that HE will be there for you always. And thank you for your blog, may God bless with a voice to the lost and those who don&#039;t know the truth. Thank you, for asking for prayer. May God hear my prayer and the prayers of others for you. GOD BLESS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang in there, my prayers are with you. I am from the opposite side of the state from you as I live in Spokane. I came across your blog for the 1st time on the American Thinker website and I enjoy what you have to say. I have been a Christian for over 40 yrs. I was saved while I was in the Navy in Sept. 1972. All I know is that God is faithful, no matter what we go through because God&#8217;s grace and mercy are irrevocable. God is not an Indian giver, once we accept his salvation and as hard as it can be at times HE is always with us and will be faithful and come through for us in a way usually we don&#8217;t understand or in another way that declares his glory. I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re going through but God will provide a way for you to survive and avoid temptation. From my own experiences and everything I&#8217;ve gone through in 40+ yrs. as a Christian I know that God is faithful, no matter what. In fact the past 5 yrs. of my life have the been the most blessed and grace filled  times of my life in the midst of adversity that I have faced since my marriage of 30 yrs. broke up in 2007. God is faithful. I am a walking testament of God&#8217;s grace and mercy and wouldn&#8217;t trade it to have things the way they were. It&#8217;s hard, at times it stinks but I know that God will provide all that I need, guaranteed and I can have peace about it. May God bless you in your journey and know that HE will be there for you always. And thank you for your blog, may God bless with a voice to the lost and those who don&#8217;t know the truth. Thank you, for asking for prayer. May God hear my prayer and the prayers of others for you. GOD BLESS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the perils of moral conviction by admin</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2012/12/06/on-the-perils-of-moral-conviction/#comment-58562</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2012/12/06/on-the-perils-of-moral-conviction/#comment-58562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe, I&#039;m currently writing an essay on that very topic -- a strange topic, I believe, but one that&#039;s worth addressing.  I can&#039;t promise you a date of release; sometimes these articles are written over periods of weeks, but I hope to have it completed sometime soon.  An excellent question!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I&#8217;m currently writing an essay on that very topic &#8212; a strange topic, I believe, but one that&#8217;s worth addressing.  I can&#8217;t promise you a date of release; sometimes these articles are written over periods of weeks, but I hope to have it completed sometime soon.  An excellent question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the perils of moral conviction by JoeB</title>
		<link>http://americanclarity.com/2012/12/06/on-the-perils-of-moral-conviction/#comment-58521</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanclarity.com/2012/12/06/on-the-perils-of-moral-conviction/#comment-58521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to ask a question, one that relates to this topic. It has to do with compulsion due to moral conviction. It is my understanding that God gave man the gift of free will. And Christ has told us that God wants us to follow His Word, but only upon our own volition. So it seems to reason, that anyone attempting to compel, or coerce non-believers to live by God&#039;s word would actually be contrary to God&#039;s will. (Believers would be following the Word of God voluntarily, so they would not need to be compelled.) Jesus taught us to educate and persuade, but I cannot find any indication that He told us to use force of any kind. Of course the majority of my Christian friends disagree, saying that it is their duty to compel non-believers, usually via legislation, to walk God&#039;s path. They typically justify their oppression by saying that they do so for the good of society, or for the good of the individual. It is my contention that oppression of any kind, regardless of intention is evil, therefore the use of force would be more in line with Satan&#039;s will than God&#039;s.
I would like to hear your thoughts, and your argument supporting your thoughts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to ask a question, one that relates to this topic. It has to do with compulsion due to moral conviction. It is my understanding that God gave man the gift of free will. And Christ has told us that God wants us to follow His Word, but only upon our own volition. So it seems to reason, that anyone attempting to compel, or coerce non-believers to live by God&#8217;s word would actually be contrary to God&#8217;s will. (Believers would be following the Word of God voluntarily, so they would not need to be compelled.) Jesus taught us to educate and persuade, but I cannot find any indication that He told us to use force of any kind. Of course the majority of my Christian friends disagree, saying that it is their duty to compel non-believers, usually via legislation, to walk God&#8217;s path. They typically justify their oppression by saying that they do so for the good of society, or for the good of the individual. It is my contention that oppression of any kind, regardless of intention is evil, therefore the use of force would be more in line with Satan&#8217;s will than God&#8217;s.<br />
I would like to hear your thoughts, and your argument supporting your thoughts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
